Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

As Java gets more and more complicated with generics, closures, etc... I keep looking for simplicity. I have the Mantra prototype, but even that subset is kind of complicated. I decided to look at Smalltalk again. Coincidentally, Nik Boyd, who built Bistro years ago contacted me; he's moved to SF Bay area, which means we can chat in person. He had lots of similar ideas to what I'm thinking about: a slightly improved Smalltalk.

Couple of issues with Smalltalk:

  • no flat file format really for humans
  • dev happens within Smalltalk environment, which is nice, but harder to integrate with other systems
  • no access modifiers; hard to say what public interface is
  • no direct field access; can't say "o x" to get o's x field
  • no a[i] array access operator; have to say "a elementAt: i" or whatever
  • no types on variables, methods
  • metaclasses confuse everybody
  • commercial versions added namespaces (packages)
  • I wonder if we need arrays vs lists? Is #(a b c) the right list syntax?
  • Is $a decent char literal syntax?
  • should have trees as default data structure
  • No labels